I thought so too, unitl I realise the interviewer’s hands are way too large!
(tried to post this yesterday but some weird database cookie error kept blocking me!)
That’s strange. The only thing cookies ever block me from are doorways.
I don’t understand why it’s expected of me to support gay people’s stuff.
I’m not against them. Ain’t that enough?
I mean. I’m not the on getting a dick up my butt. Why should i care?
What about lesbians tho?
It’s time for us to change our minds about this colorful kind of people. Specially when they come in the shape of 2 girls, kissing, half naked on a pool of nacho cheese.
I would love a beach towel and/or flag like that. The feather boa would be brilliant, too.
Just because you are against homosexials being married (and no, I´m not) doesn´t mean you have an issue with homosexuals. More that you are strict on a religious ritual.
Easily refuted by pointing out that many heterosexuals get married in registry offices and other non-religious sites, with no apparent protestation.
Ah, the irrefutable separate but equal argument. History has shown it’s one that just doesn’t have any glaring holes in it whatsoever.
Obey my politics or No pussy for you? What kind of message is that?
11 comments on “To Be Honest”
Are they being interviewed by Donald Trump?
I thought so too, unitl I realise the interviewer’s hands are way too large!
(tried to post this yesterday but some weird database cookie error kept blocking me!)
That’s strange. The only thing cookies ever block me from are doorways.
I don’t understand why it’s expected of me to support gay people’s stuff.
I’m not against them. Ain’t that enough?
I mean. I’m not the on getting a dick up my butt. Why should i care?
What about lesbians tho?
It’s time for us to change our minds about this colorful kind of people. Specially when they come in the shape of 2 girls, kissing, half naked on a pool of nacho cheese.
I would love a beach towel and/or flag like that. The feather boa would be brilliant, too.
Just because you are against homosexials being married (and no, I´m not) doesn´t mean you have an issue with homosexuals. More that you are strict on a religious ritual.
Easily refuted by pointing out that many heterosexuals get married in registry offices and other non-religious sites, with no apparent protestation.
Ah, the irrefutable separate but equal argument. History has shown it’s one that just doesn’t have any glaring holes in it whatsoever.
Obey my politics or No pussy for you? What kind of message is that?